![]() ![]() So what did we learn today? Oh, I'm not finished yet-I'm just getting warmed up! Let's keep rolling! Why does take seven (7) full seconds to load my search results? Let me state this in unambiguous terms: it's not okay for a standard operating system feature to crash! I know, I know, ], but it's still not okay! Okay? Alternately, live dangerously-go ahead and let go of TAB before the window appears! "What happens then," you may ask? Well, let's check out #3, shall we?ģ.After the window appears (Not before! Don't you dare let go of TAB before this is ready!), let go of TAB,.But I can't live with the fact that this ALT+TAB replacement is noticeably slower than the original ALT+TAB behavior! In other words, a simple one-step 'tap ALT+TAB' operation turns into the following: Believe it or not, I could live with the fuzzy, unreadable text shown above. I've highlighted the important parts below, and no, you're not going blind-this is how it looks!Ģ. And by that, I mean that this looks brutally ugly with ClearType on. Let's do this by the numbers:ġ. This Powertoy and Windows XP's ClearType do not play well together. The problem is: using this PowerToy is actually worse than sticking with the standard Windows XP ALT+TAB behavior. The idea is that you're given more information about each window at no cost-thus far, this sounds nice! Here's a screenshot of the Powertoy in action: Please excuse me while I rip on your creation.Īs a short introduction: this PowerToy replaces the default ALT+TAB window with a larger window that shows screenshots of each of your windows. To be fair to the original authors: I understand this was probably built off-hours as a labor of love, and I do understand a lot of work went into building this particular toy. For an example, I'll pick on the Windows XP PowerToys ALT+TAB Replacement tool. Getting to a point I'd like to make: not all productivity tools help. ![]() Once you've returned, we'll continue, okay? Just take your time. I'll leave you some time alone to grieve. I know this is incredibly outrageous, but it turns out: FoxIt PDF Reader is, in fact, not all gravy. This is something I've rarely (if ever) seen covered elsewhere: I'm here to report that, contrary to all the positive buzz, those oddball third-party products allegedly ten times better/faster/stronger than the originals do have flaws. It's true-I've crashed FoxIt attempting to load two entirely different documents coming from separate sources. FoxIt does not attempt sneak in totally unrelated software in the guise of 'Acrobat updates' like Adobe is now doing ("now" being ).īut, I'm here to tell you: it's not all gravy. ![]() You can install FoxIt reader faster than you can load a PDF document with Adobe it's that ridiculous.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |